“Supreme Court Allows Nationwide Health Care Subsidies”

Article Link

This June 25, 2015 New York Times article talks about the supreme court ruling upholding the subsidies to low and middle class people for healthcare insurance.

Advertisements

“Reasonable Accommodations”

Article Link

This March 25, 2015 Slate article talks about questions raised by the Supreme Court about the number of mentally ill people shot by police as it compares to the number of police shot by mentally ill people and asks if the ADA should be applied more often to mitigate  a less violent approach to dealing with people with mental health issues as opposed to creating a society where the mentally ill are killed on sight.

English: Commemorative plate of mentally ill victims of German crimes in Fort VII in Poznań Polski: Tablica upamiętniająca chore psychicznie ofiary niemieckich zbrodni w Forcie VII w Poznaniu (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Related articles

• “Do the Lives of the Mentally Ill Matter to the Supreme Court?” (madinamerica.com)
• Mental Health in Workplace: Employee’s Privacy vs. Employer’s Right to Know (insurancejournal.com)
• Supreme Court weighs police tactics, rights of mentally ill (goerie.com)
• Is The Supreme Court About To Give Cops The Right To Execute The Mentally Ill? (addictinginfo.org)
• Within 19 Seconds Cops Shoot Mentally Ill Man Holding Screwdriver (thisweekinblackness.com)

“What the Hobby Lobby Decision Means for People with Mental Illness”

Article Link

This July 1, 2014 Healthy Place blog post talks about the potential domino effect of issues that could occur as a result of the Hobby Lobby ruling by the Supreme Court.  I truly hope that this doesn’t occur, but the impact could reach beyond birth control and impact other things like medications used to treat mental illness or  other forms of mental health treatment.  In short we need to ask what door has the Supreme Court ruling about Hobby Lobby not being required to pay for birth control due to a sincere religious belief opened and what will the fallout of this ruling look like?

US Supreme Court (Photo credit: dbking)

Related articles

• Gitmo Detainees Sue, Cite Hobby Lobby

“Here’s why voter ID will be requested, not required, in November elections: PennLive letters “

Nouormand: Êlections au mais d’Octobre 2008, Jèrri (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Article Link

This October 15, 2013 article found on the Patriot-News powered Penn Live website in Central Pennsylvania, explains why voters will be asked for ID at the coming election, but NOT required in most cases to present it.  the long-standing rule about someone who is a first time voter at their assigned polling place will still apply.  Voters who have voted at their assigned polling place before will be asked for id, but NOT required to show it.  The new Voter ID law is still on hold by order of the state Supreme Court. Here’s a link to an August 16, 2013 article that talks about the court ruling on Pennsylvania’s Voter ID Law found on the HuffPost website

Related articles

• Voter ID law challengers say “Show it” ads confuse voters (pennlive.com)
• Voter ID ads draw controversy (republicanherald.com)
• Pa. official criticizes $1 million voter ID ads (readingeagle.com)